During those dealings the lady from the Min asked me:
"I have looked back at the applications on file for your older
children and I can see that you have made some changes in your approach to home
schooling over the years to the point where you have adopted the planned
approach for Joseph. I am very interested in how home educators make these
decisions and changes over time and I would like to hear more about this. I
know that many home educators do change their approach over the years from the
time of applications and it would be useful for my learning to hear more about
this aspect."
She also asked, at one point, how we would know if Joseph will be learning as he should be.
This is some of what I said to her:
How we will know he is progressing as he should be across the learning
areas:
I really have trouble with the “as he should be” part of this because in my
experience of many different learning/teaching styles, and many different
children I am confident that putting an expectation on a child of what
should be achieved at a certain stage is unhealthy.
I am sure you agree that nobody puts constraints on a baby as to when they
crawl, stand, speak etc – however I also understand that if a baby was not
walking by 2 years old, then something may be a amiss.
When I look at our older children I am given more and more confidence that
despite the age at which they learned to read, multiply, speak a foreign
language, research, debate, memorise etc – then the learning happened over their
younger years – and most importantly that the learning happened WHEN THEY WERE
READY TO RECEIVE the learning, and therefore it is remembered.
It’s safe to say that I don’t notice every success and sign of progress
that my children make as they can be naturally very gradual and smooth. The
progress does not need to be noticed/noted for it to continue – the children
move ahead very naturally in their own ways, enjoying the feeling of getting
better at something or gaining some new skill.
Of course, big milestones like riding a bike by himself, or learning all
the words to a poem and reciting it, or completing a whole colouring picture by
himself, or following along with a story and knowing where all “his” words are
and reading them out loud, bringing me the results of his workshop project –
these things ARE noticed by me, and I celebrate them appropriately with him
according to his mood (whether he needs a smile, a tickle, a high-five, a whoop
or great bursts of clapping).
You mentioned you were interested in why families might change their
learning style over the years. Here are my thoughts.
Above I mentioned the fact that a child will remember things if they are
learned during a time a child was interested in a subject – this is the crux of
natural learning, and I believe it is why many families go from a more
structured learning style (wherein the parent feels more “in control” of the
learning, feeling more that they can achieve a successful result because
everything is laid out in a specific order to ensure the main points are
covered) to a more natural (unschooling/delight directed learning) style.
Natural learning can, on the face of it, seem rather messy, chaotic or
perplexing from those looking from the outside, but the depth of learning and
the excitement and enjoyment the children have results in much learning being
absorbed and subsequently turned over and over in their minds later.
As an
example the other day before I could get out of bed I had four little boys in
with me. The baby was playing quietly, Joseph was on and off the bed playing
with cars, our 8 and 10 year olds were cozy under the blankets. Our 8 year old
asked me about Winston Churchill and the bad guy that he couldn’t remember the
name of. Then they both listened very intently as I told them about Hitler, and
the state that Germany was in after WWI, and Jewish people, concentration camps,
gypsies, gas chambers, Corrie Ten Boom, Churchill etc etc. If I had an
expectation that everything I said would be remembered, then I would perhaps
become exasperated that some of it was forgotten. However, I see life learning
as a large number of “jigsaw puzzles” in a child’s mind. Every time the
children hear some new information they might taken in a bit of it – or all of
it depending on their interest and their ability to take it in and relate it to
other information they know – they gain a piece (or pieces) of one or some of
the puzzles. Next time the subject comes around they may already have many
pieces of that puzzle and they will gain some more and start to see the picture
more clearly.
An example of that was when I was speaking about Churchill I mentioned the
BBC Documentary “Wartime Farm” that the children enjoyed, and I said about
Churchill keeping the hope of English people live, that they needed to believe
they could win the war. The children remembered the bits in that documentary
where the folks did without things and endured hardship.
Therefore, if I could see into their minds, and I could view their “jigsaw
puzzles” I might see that the “WW2” puzzle had more pieces in it since our talk
about concentration camps, and their “Winston Churchill” puzzle had more pieces
in relation to making noteworthy speeches, and their “Hitler and commanding
officers” puzzle had a few more pieces in relation to cyanide pills.
No comments:
Post a Comment